↓ Skip to main content

Teamwork skills, shared mental models, and performance in simulated trauma teams: an independent group design

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Teamwork skills, shared mental models, and performance in simulated trauma teams: an independent group design
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1757-7241-18-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidi Kristina Westli, Bjørn Helge Johnsen, Jarle Eid, Ingvil Rasten, Guttorm Brattebø

Abstract

Non-technical skills are seen as an important contributor to reducing adverse events and improving medical management in healthcare teams. Previous research on the effectiveness of teams has suggested that shared mental models facilitate coordination and team performance. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether demonstrated teamwork skills and behaviour indicating shared mental models would be associated with observed improved medical management in trauma team simulations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 204 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Other 15 7%
Other 47 22%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Psychology 21 10%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Computer Science 10 5%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 44 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,197,873
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#90
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,617
of 103,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.