You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Climate change and dengue: a critical and systematic review of quantitative modelling approaches
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-14-167 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Suchithra Naish, Pat Dale, John S Mackenzie, John McBride, Kerrie Mengersen, Shilu Tong |
Abstract |
Many studies have found associations between climatic conditions and dengue transmission. However, there is a debate about the future impacts of climate change on dengue transmission. This paper reviewed epidemiological evidence on the relationship between climate and dengue with a focus on quantitative methods for assessing the potential impacts of climate change on global dengue transmission. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 7% |
Curaçao | 1 | 7% |
Turkey | 1 | 7% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
France | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Zimbabwe | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 648 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 627 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 112 | 17% |
Researcher | 86 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 81 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 4% |
Other | 103 | 16% |
Unknown | 164 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 62 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 5% |
Other | 142 | 22% |
Unknown | 192 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#384,072
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#101
of 8,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,176
of 242,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.