You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of supplementing n-3 fatty acid enriched eggs and walnuts on cardiovascular disease risk markers in healthy free-living lacto-ovo-vegetarians: a randomized, crossover, free-living intervention study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-29 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bonny Burns-Whitmore, Ella Haddad, Joan Sabaté, Sujatha Rajaram |
Abstract |
Plant and marine n-3 fatty acids (FA) may favorably modify select markers of cardiovascular disease risk. Whether supplementing the habitual diet of lacto-ovo-vegetarians (LOV) with walnuts (containing α-linolenic acid, ALA) and n-3 FA enriched eggs (containing primarily docosahexaenoic acid, DHA and ALA) would have equivalent effects on CVD risk factors is explored in this study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 50% |
Finland | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 42% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 167 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 29 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 17% |
Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 17% |
Unknown | 35 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
Other | 22 | 13% |
Unknown | 46 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,847,000
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#600
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,934
of 224,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.