↓ Skip to main content

Contraception in HIV-positive female adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS Research and Therapy, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contraception in HIV-positive female adolescents
Published in
AIDS Research and Therapy, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1742-6405-8-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadia T Kancheva Landolt, Sudrak Lakhonphon, Jintanat Ananworanich

Abstract

Sexual behavior of HIV-positive youths, whether infected perinatally, through risky behavior or other ways, is not substantially different from that of HIV-uninfected peers. Because of highly active antiretroviral therapy, increasing number of children, infected perinatally, are surviving into adolescence and are becoming sexually active and need reproductive health services. The objective of this article is to review the methods of contraception appropriate for HIV-positive adolescents with a special focus on hormonal contraceptives. Delaying the start of sexual life and the use of two methods thereafter, one of which is the male condom and the other a highly effective contraceptive method such as hormonal contraception or an intrauterine device, is currently the most effective option for those who desire simultaneous protection from both pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Health care providers should be aware of the possible pharmacokinetic interactions between hormonal contraception and antiretrovirals. There is an urgent need for more information regarding metabolic outcomes of hormonal contraceptives, especially the effect of injectable progestins on bone metabolism, in HIV-positive adolescent girls.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 24%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 29%
Social Sciences 16 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 20 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2011.
All research outputs
#5,327,963
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from AIDS Research and Therapy
#155
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,484
of 122,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS Research and Therapy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them