You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC): protocol for a mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas J Waltz, Byron J Powell, Matthew J Chinman, Jeffrey L Smith, Monica M Matthieu, Enola K Proctor, Laura J Damschroder, JoAnn E Kirchner |
| Abstract |
Identifying feasible and effective implementation strategies that are contextually appropriate is a challenge for researchers and implementers, exacerbated by the lack of conceptual clarity surrounding terms and definitions for implementation strategies, as well as a literature that provides imperfect guidance regarding how one might select strategies for a given healthcare quality improvement effort. In this study, we will engage an Expert Panel comprising implementation scientists and mental health clinical managers to: establish consensus on a common nomenclature for implementation strategy terms, definitions and categories; and develop recommendations to enhance the match between implementation strategies selected to facilitate the use of evidence-based programs and the context of certain service settings, in this case the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health services. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| Portugal | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 267 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 19% |
| Unknown | 71 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 17% |
| Psychology | 37 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 80 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#831,407
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#87
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,717
of 238,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.