↓ Skip to main content

Training in dual diagnosis interventions (the COMO Study): Randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training in dual diagnosis interventions (the COMO Study): Randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-8-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Hughes, Shamil Wanigaratne, Kevin Gournay, Sonia Johnson, Graham Thornicroft, Emily Finch, Jane Marshall, Neil Smith

Abstract

Despite the high prevalence of co-morbid substance use among mental health service users (dual diagnosis), very few mental health workers in the UK have had training and/or clinical experience to equip them to deliver targeted interventions to this client group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,744,738
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,236
of 4,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,594
of 79,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.