You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are herders protected by their herds? An experimental analysis of zooprophylaxis against the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-10-68 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iňaki Tirados, Gabriella Gibson, Stephen Young, Stephen J Torr |
| Abstract |
The number of Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) and Anopheles pharoensis caught by human and cattle baits was investigated experimentally in the Arba Minch district of southern Ethiopia to determine if attraction to humans, indoors or outdoors, was affected by the presence or absence of cattle. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,472,093
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#991
of 5,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,583
of 114,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#10
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.