↓ Skip to main content

Who children spend time with after school: associations with objectively recorded indoor and outdoor physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
66 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Who children spend time with after school: associations with objectively recorded indoor and outdoor physical activity
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pearce M, Page AS, Griffin TP, Cooper AR, Matthew Pearce, Angie S Page, Tom P Griffin, Ashley R Cooper

Abstract

Understanding how the determinants of behaviour vary by context may support the design of interventions aiming to increase physical activity. Such factors include independent mobility, time outdoors and the availability of other children. At present little is known about who children spend their time with after school, how this relates to time spent indoors or outdoors and activity in these locations. This study aimed to quantify who children spend their time with when indoors or outdoors and associations with moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Master 24 17%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 20%
Sports and Recreations 21 15%
Psychology 11 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 39 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2016.
All research outputs
#314,274
of 17,894,186 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#100
of 1,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,615
of 199,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,894,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.