↓ Skip to main content

Biological embedding of childhood adversity: from physiological mechanisms to clinical implications

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
156 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
371 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
716 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological embedding of childhood adversity: from physiological mechanisms to clinical implications
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12916-017-0895-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne E. Berens, Sarah K. G. Jensen, Charles A. Nelson

Abstract

Adverse psychosocial exposures in early life, namely experiences such as child maltreatment, caregiver stress or depression, and domestic or community violence, have been associated in epidemiological studies with increased lifetime risk of adverse outcomes, including diabetes, heart disease, cancers, and psychiatric illnesses. Additional work has shed light on the potential molecular mechanisms by which early adversity becomes "biologically embedded" in altered physiology across body systems. This review surveys evidence on such mechanisms and calls on researchers, clinicians, policymakers, and other practitioners to act upon evidence. Childhood psychosocial adversity has wide-ranging effects on neural, endocrine, immune, and metabolic physiology. Molecular mechanisms broadly implicate disruption of central neural networks, neuroendocrine stress dysregulation, and chronic inflammation, among other changes. Physiological disruption predisposes individuals to common diseases across the life course. Reviewed evidence has important implications for clinical practice, biomedical research, and work across other sectors relevant to public health and child wellbeing. Warranted changes include increased clinical screening for exposures among children and adults, scale-up of effective interventions, policy advocacy, and ongoing research to develop new evidence-based response strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 716 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 716 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 13%
Researcher 91 13%
Student > Master 82 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 71 10%
Student > Bachelor 70 10%
Other 114 16%
Unknown 192 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 158 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 85 12%
Social Sciences 61 9%
Neuroscience 53 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 7%
Other 77 11%
Unknown 233 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#388,280
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#307
of 4,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,122
of 327,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.