You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Natural history of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus(VRE): a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-14-177 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erica S Shenoy, Molly L Paras, Farzad Noubary, Rochelle P Walensky, David C Hooper |
Abstract |
No published systematic reviews have assessed the natural history of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Time to clearance of colonization has important implications for patient care and infection control policy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Sweden | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 159 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 15% |
Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
Other | 31 | 19% |
Unknown | 26 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 10% |
Unknown | 41 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,589,018
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,251
of 8,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,529
of 240,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#19
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.