↓ Skip to main content

Is healthy behavior contagious: associations of social norms with physical activity and healthy eating

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 2,116)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
51 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is healthy behavior contagious: associations of social norms with physical activity and healthy eating
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-7-86
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kylie Ball, Robert W Jeffery, Gavin Abbott, Sarah A McNaughton, David Crawford

Abstract

Social norms are theoretically hypothesized to influence health-related behaviors such as physical activity and eating behaviors. However, empirical evidence relating social norms to these behaviors, independently of other more commonly-investigated social constructs such as social support, is scarce and findings equivocal, perhaps due to limitations in the ways in which social norms have been conceptualized and assessed. This study investigated associations between clearly-defined social norms and a range of physical activity and eating behaviors amongst women, adjusting for the effects of social support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 429 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 20%
Student > Master 74 17%
Student > Bachelor 53 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 10%
Researcher 36 8%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 84 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 81 18%
Social Sciences 61 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 5%
Other 90 20%
Unknown 116 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 425. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#67,630
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#15
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208
of 190,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.