↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
532 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Critical Care, January 2006
DOI 10.1186/cc5101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Karakitsos, Nicolaos Labropoulos, Eric De Groot, Alexandros P Patrianakos, Gregorios Kouraklis, John Poularas, George Samonis, Dimosthenis A Tsoutsos, Manousos M Konstadoulakis, Andreas Karabinis

Abstract

Central venous cannulation is crucial in the management of the critical care patient. This study was designed to evaluate whether real-time ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein is superior to the standard landmark method.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Italy 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 315 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 17%
Student > Postgraduate 50 15%
Other 39 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 8%
Student > Master 25 7%
Other 94 28%
Unknown 42 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 247 74%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 <1%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 48 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,284,714
of 14,619,054 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,139
of 4,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,131
of 190,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#21
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,619,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.