↓ Skip to main content

Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
566 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients
Published in
Critical Care, November 2006
DOI 10.1186/cc5101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Karakitsos, Nicolaos Labropoulos, Eric De Groot, Alexandros P Patrianakos, Gregorios Kouraklis, John Poularas, George Samonis, Dimosthenis A Tsoutsos, Manousos M Konstadoulakis, Andreas Karabinis

Abstract

Central venous cannulation is crucial in the management of the critical care patient. This study was designed to evaluate whether real-time ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein is superior to the standard landmark method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Italy 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 345 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 16%
Student > Postgraduate 53 15%
Other 43 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 8%
Student > Master 27 7%
Other 97 27%
Unknown 58 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 256 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 65 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#6,238,302
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,583
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,741
of 166,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.