You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: Functional implications of microbial and viral gut metagenome changes in early stage L-DOPA-naïve Parkinson’s disease patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-017-0451-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. R. Bedarf, F. Hildebrand, L. P. Coelho, S. Sunagawa, M. Bahram, F. Goeser, P. Bork, U. Wüllner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,217,488
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#846
of 1,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,905
of 315,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.