↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with recent HIV testing among younger gay and bisexual men in New Zealand, 2006-2011

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with recent HIV testing among younger gay and bisexual men in New Zealand, 2006-2011
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan J Lachowsky, Peter JW Saxton, Nigel P Dickson, Anthony J Hughes, Alastair JS Summerlee, Cate E Dewey

Abstract

Understanding HIV testing behaviour is vital to developing evidence-based policy and programming that supports optimal HIV care, support, and prevention. This has not been investigated among younger gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (YMSM, aged 16-29) in New Zealand.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
El Salvador 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 16 18%
Unspecified 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 19%
Social Sciences 12 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Unspecified 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,064,812
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,148
of 15,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,071
of 227,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#156
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.