You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors associated with recent HIV testing among younger gay and bisexual men in New Zealand, 2006-2011
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-294 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nathan J Lachowsky, Peter JW Saxton, Nigel P Dickson, Anthony J Hughes, Alastair JS Summerlee, Cate E Dewey |
Abstract |
Understanding HIV testing behaviour is vital to developing evidence-based policy and programming that supports optimal HIV care, support, and prevention. This has not been investigated among younger gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (YMSM, aged 16-29) in New Zealand. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
El Salvador | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 19% |
Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
Unspecified | 7 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
Unspecified | 7 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,064,812
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,148
of 15,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,071
of 227,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#156
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.