You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Predictors of default from follow-up care in a cervical cancer screening program using direct visual inspection in south-western Nigeria
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-143 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Oliver Chukwujekwu Ezechi, Karen Odberg Petterson, Titilola A Gabajabiamila, Ifeoma Eugenia Idigbe, Olutunmike Kuyoro, Innocent Achaya Otobo Ujah, Per Olof Ostergren |
Abstract |
Increasingly evidence is emerging from south East Asia, southern and east Africa on the burden of default to follow up care after a positive cervical cancer screening/diagnosis, which impacts negatively on cervical cancer prevention and control. Unfortunately little or no information exists on the subject in the West Africa sub region. This study was designed to determine the proportion of and predictors and reasons for default from follow up care after positive cervical cancer screen. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
Ghana | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 18% |
Student > Master | 18 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2014.
All research outputs
#14,131,535
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,017
of 7,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,699
of 226,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#89
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.