↓ Skip to main content

Seeing is believing: new methods for in situsingle-cell transcriptomics

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seeing is believing: new methods for in situsingle-cell transcriptomics
Published in
Genome Biology, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/gb4169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gal Avital, Tamar Hashimshony, Itai Yanai

Abstract

New methods employ RNA-seq to study single cells within complex tissues by in situ sequencing or mRNA capture from single photoactivated cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 131 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 28%
Researcher 32 23%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 20%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Engineering 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 18 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,883,058
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,570
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,604
of 239,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#26
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.