↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of mercury bioremediation by transgenic bacteria expressing metallothionein and polyphosphate kinase

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 957)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
14 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of mercury bioremediation by transgenic bacteria expressing metallothionein and polyphosphate kinase
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-11-82
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oscar N Ruiz, Derry Alvarez, Gloriene Gonzalez-Ruiz, Cesar Torres

Abstract

The use of transgenic bacteria has been proposed as a suitable alternative for mercury remediation. Ideally, mercury would be sequestered by metal-scavenging agents inside transgenic bacteria for subsequent retrieval. So far, this approach has produced limited protection and accumulation. We report here the development of a transgenic system that effectively expresses metallothionein (mt-1) and polyphosphate kinase (ppk) genes in bacteria in order to provide high mercury resistance and accumulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 168 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 26%
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 14%
Environmental Science 19 11%
Engineering 9 5%
Chemistry 7 4%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 34 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#743,313
of 24,241,559 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#11
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,811
of 123,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,241,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.