↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Positive selection neighboring functionally essential sites and disease-implicated regions of mammalian reproductive proteins

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Positive selection neighboring functionally essential sites and disease-implicated regions of mammalian reproductive proteins
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12862-017-1015-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire C Morgan, Noeleen B Loughran, Thomas A Walsh, Alan J Harrison, Mary J O’Connell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 13%
United States 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#10,213,822
of 11,511,689 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#2,087
of 2,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,458
of 262,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#47
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,511,689 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.