↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of low back pain: effect, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility of maintenance care – study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of low back pain: effect, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility of maintenance care – study protocol for a randomized clinical trial
Published in
Trials, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Eklund, Iben Axén, Alice Kongsted, Malin Lohela-Karlsson, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Irene Jensen

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition and a socioeconomic problem in many countries. Due to its recurrent nature, the prevention of further episodes (secondary prevention), seems logical. Furthermore, when the condition is persistent, the minimization of symptoms and prevention of deterioration (tertiary prevention), is equally important. Research has largely focused on treatment methods for symptomatic episodes, and little is known about preventive treatment strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 19%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Other 16 9%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 38 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 50 27%