↓ Skip to main content

Sparse canonical methods for biological data integration: application to a cross-platform study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sparse canonical methods for biological data integration: application to a cross-platform study
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-10-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim-Anh Lê Cao, Pascal GP Martin, Christèle Robert-Granié, Philippe Besse

Abstract

In the context of systems biology, few sparse approaches have been proposed so far to integrate several data sets. It is however an important and fundamental issue that will be widely encountered in post genomic studies, when simultaneously analyzing transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics data using different platforms, so as to understand the mutual interactions between the different data sets. In this high dimensional setting, variable selection is crucial to give interpretable results. We focus on a sparse Partial Least Squares approach (sPLS) to handle two-block data sets, where the relationship between the two types of variables is known to be symmetric. Sparse PLS has been developed either for a regression or a canonical correlation framework and includes a built-in procedure to select variables while integrating data. To illustrate the canonical mode approach, we analyzed the NCI60 data sets, where two different platforms (cDNA and Affymetrix chips) were used to study the transcriptome of sixty cancer cell lines.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
Germany 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 286 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 96 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 7%
Other 15 5%
Student > Bachelor 14 4%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 33 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 15%
Computer Science 40 13%
Mathematics 33 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 5%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 40 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,598,731
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,333
of 7,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,613
of 170,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#11
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.