↓ Skip to main content

Combined influence of epoch length, cut-point and bout duration on accelerometry-derived physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined influence of epoch length, cut-point and bout duration on accelerometry-derived physical activity
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Orme, Katrien Wijndaele, Stephen J Sharp, Kate Westgate, Ulf Ekelund, Soren Brage

Abstract

It is difficult to compare accelerometer-derived estimates of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) between studies due to differences in data processing procedures. We aimed to evaluate the effects of accelerometer processing options on total and bout-accumulated time spent in MVPA in adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 134 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 24%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 27 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#5,590,039
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,375
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,053
of 220,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.