↓ Skip to main content

Stability of dietary patterns assessed with reduced rank regression; the Zutphen Elderly Study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stability of dietary patterns assessed with reduced rank regression; the Zutphen Elderly Study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-13-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Jankovic, Martinette T Steppel, Ellen Kampman, Lisette CPGM de Groot, Hendriek C Boshuizen, Sabita S Soedamah-Muthu, Daan Kromhout, Edith JM Feskens

Abstract

Reduced rank regression (RRR) combines exploratory analysis with a-priori knowledge by including risk factors in the model. Dietary patterns, derived from RRR analysis, can be interpreted by the chosen risk factor profile and give an indication of positive or adverse health effects for a specific disease. Our aim was to assess the stability of dietary patterns derived by RRR over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 4%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Chemistry 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,226,756
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,356
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,272
of 226,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#25
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.