↓ Skip to main content

Facilitating myoelectric-control with transcranial direct current stimulation: a preliminary study in healthy humans

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facilitating myoelectric-control with transcranial direct current stimulation: a preliminary study in healthy humans
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anirban Dutta, Walter Paulus, Michael A Nitsche

Abstract

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) can electrically activate paretic muscles to assist movement for post-stroke neurorehabilitation. Here, sensory-motor integration may be facilitated by triggering FES with residual electromyographic (EMG) activity. However, muscle activity following stroke often suffers from delays in initiation and termination which may be alleviated with an adjuvant treatment at the central nervous system (CNS) level with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) thereby facilitating re-learning and retaining of normative muscle activation patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 22 17%
Psychology 20 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Engineering 15 12%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,091
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,107
of 327,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.