You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Facilitating myoelectric-control with transcranial direct current stimulation: a preliminary study in healthy humans
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anirban Dutta, Walter Paulus, Michael A Nitsche |
Abstract |
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) can electrically activate paretic muscles to assist movement for post-stroke neurorehabilitation. Here, sensory-motor integration may be facilitated by triggering FES with residual electromyographic (EMG) activity. However, muscle activity following stroke often suffers from delays in initiation and termination which may be alleviated with an adjuvant treatment at the central nervous system (CNS) level with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) thereby facilitating re-learning and retaining of normative muscle activation patterns. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Serbia | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 127 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 18% |
Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 22 | 17% |
Psychology | 20 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
Engineering | 15 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 12% |
Unknown | 33 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,091
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,107
of 327,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.