You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of serological and molecular panels for diagnosis of vector-borne diseases in dogs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-3305-7-127 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ricardo G Maggi, Adam J Birkenheuer, Barbara C Hegarty, Julie M Bradley, Michael G Levy, Edward B Breitschwerdt |
Abstract |
Canine vector-borne diseases (CVBD) are caused by a diverse array of pathogens with varying biological behaviors that result in a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and laboratory abnormalities. For many reasons, the diagnosis of canine vector-borne infectious diseases can be challenging for clinicians. The aim of the present study was to compare CVBD serological and molecular testing as the two most common methodologies used for screening healthy dogs or diagnosing sick dogs in which a vector-borne disease is suspected. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 153 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 17% |
Researcher | 19 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 11% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Other | 32 | 20% |
Unknown | 33 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 40 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Unknown | 35 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,983,535
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,140
of 5,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,217
of 238,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#36
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.