You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chlorpyrifos and neurodevelopmental effects: a literature review and expert elicitation on research and policy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Health, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-11-s1-s5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margaret Saunders, Brooke L Magnanti, Sara Correia Carreira, Aileen Yang, Urinda Alamo-Hernández, Horacio Riojas-Rodriguez, Gemma Calamandrei, Janna G Koppe, Martin Krayer von Krauss, Hans Keune, Alena Bartonova |
Abstract |
Organophosphate pesticides are widely used on food crops grown in the EU. While they have been banned from indoor use in the US for a decade due to adverse health effects, they are still the most prevalent pesticides in the EU, with Chlorpyrifos (CPF) being the most commonly applied. It has been suggested CPF affects neurodevelopment even at levels below toxicity guidelines. Younger individuals may be more susceptible than adults due to biological factors and exposure settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 4 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
France | 2 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Turkey | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 97% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 198 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 37 | 18% |
Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 9% |
Other | 32 | 16% |
Unknown | 37 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 15 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
Other | 50 | 25% |
Unknown | 50 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,114,710
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#244
of 1,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,949
of 177,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.