↓ Skip to main content

Karyotypic diversity in seven Amazonian anurans in the genus Hypsiboas (family Hylidae)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomic Data, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Karyotypic diversity in seven Amazonian anurans in the genus Hypsiboas (family Hylidae)
Published in
BMC Genomic Data, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-15-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thais Lemos de Mattos, Ana Carolina Coelho, Carlos Henrique Schneider, David Otávio Carmo Telles, Marcelo Menin, Maria Claudia Gross

Abstract

Hypsiboas species have been divided into seven groups using morphological and genetic characters, but for most of the species, there is no cytogenetic information available. A cytogenetic analysis using conventional staining, C-banding, silver staining, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with telomeric sequence probes were used to investigate the karyotype of seven Amazon species of the genus Hypsiboas belonging to the following intrageneric groups: H. punctatus (H. cinerascens), H. semilineatus (H. boans, H. geographicus, and H. wavrini), and H. albopunctatus (H. lanciformis, H. multifasciatus, and H. raniceps). The aim was to differentiate between the karyotypes and use the chromosomal markers to distinguish between the Hypsiboas groups. The data were compared with a previous phylogenetic proposal for these anurans. In addition, H. lanciformis, H. boans, and H. wavrini are described here for the first time, and we characterize the diploid numbers for H. cinerascens, H. geographicus, H. multifasciatus, and H. raniceps.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 7%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 22%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 20%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#668
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,670
of 239,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.