↓ Skip to main content

How to optimize tuberculosis case finding: explorations for Indonesia with a health system model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to optimize tuberculosis case finding: explorations for Indonesia with a health system model
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-9-87
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riris A Ahmad, Yodi Mahendradhata, Jane Cunningham, Adi Utarini, Sake J de Vlas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 123 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,810,411
of 23,702,491 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,645
of 7,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,733
of 116,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,702,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.