You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of a primary care-based intervention to reduce sitting time in overweight and obese patients (SEDESTACTIV): a randomized controlled trial; rationale and study design
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-228 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carme Martín-Borràs, Maria Giné-Garriga, Elena Martínez, Carlos Martín-Cantera, Elisa Puigdoménech, Mercè Solà, Eva Castillo, Angela Mª Beltrán, Anna Puig-Ribera, José Manuel Trujillo, Olga Pueyo, Javier Pueyo, Beatriz Rodríguez, Noemí Serra-Paya, SEDESTACTIV Study Group |
Abstract |
There is growing evidence suggesting that prolonged sitting has negative effects on people's weight, chronic diseases and mortality. Interventions to reduce sedentary time can be an effective strategy to increase daily energy expenditure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a six-month primary care intervention to reduce daily of sitting time in overweight and mild obese sedentary patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 266 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 12% |
Student > Master | 32 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
Other | 16 | 6% |
Other | 56 | 21% |
Unknown | 77 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 17% |
Sports and Recreations | 28 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
Psychology | 8 | 3% |
Other | 31 | 11% |
Unknown | 85 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,226,756
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,856
of 14,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,806
of 221,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#272
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.