↓ Skip to main content

Economic incentive in community nursing: attraction, rejection or indifference?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic incentive in community nursing: attraction, rejection or indifference?
Published in
Human Resources for Health, April 2003
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-1-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mireille Kingma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Social Sciences 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 9%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#855
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,642
of 62,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.