↓ Skip to main content

Different delivery mechanisms for insecticide-treated nets in rural Burkina Faso: a provider's perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different delivery mechanisms for insecticide-treated nets in rural Burkina Faso: a provider's perspective
Published in
Malaria Journal, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-352
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Beiersmann, Manuela De Allegri, Justin Tiendrebéogo, Maurice Yé, Albrecht Jahn, Olaf Mueller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Burkina Faso 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Pakistan 1 2%
Unknown 61 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 30%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Social Sciences 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 8%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,467
of 5,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,305
of 181,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#16
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.