↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of the Newcastle laryngeal hypersensitivity questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in Cough, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of the Newcastle laryngeal hypersensitivity questionnaire
Published in
Cough, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-9974-10-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne E Vertigan, Sarah L Bone, Peter G Gibson

Abstract

Laryngeal hypersensitivity may be an important component of the common disorders of laryngeal motor dysfunction including chronic refractory cough, pdoxical vocal fold movement (vocal cord dysfunction), muscle tension dysphonia, and globus pharyngeus. Patients with these conditions frequently report sensory disturbances, and an emerging concept of the 'irritable larynx' suggests common features of a sensory neuropathic dysfunction as a part of these disorders. The aim of this study was to develop a Laryngeal Hypersensitivity Questionnaire for patients with laryngeal dysfunction syndromes in order to measure the laryngeal sensory disturbance occurring in these conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Other 11 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Professor 6 7%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Linguistics 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,376,132
of 24,584,609 outputs
Outputs from Cough
#10
of 62 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,423
of 229,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cough
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,584,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them