↓ Skip to main content

Technical aspects of single-port thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Technical aspects of single-port thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1749-8090-7-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chih-Hao Chen, Shih-Yi Lee, Ho Chang, Hung-Chang Liu, Chao-Hung Chen, Wen-Chien Huang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2017.
All research outputs
#5,967,361
of 18,313,653 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#102
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,797
of 279,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,313,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them