You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Technical aspects of single-port thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-7-50 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chih-Hao Chen, Shih-Yi Lee, Ho Chang, Hung-Chang Liu, Chao-Hung Chen, Wen-Chien Huang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 33% |
Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 67% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#152
of 1,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,581
of 167,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.