↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome with allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
patent
4 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
363 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome with allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study
Published in
Respiratory Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-15-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guoping Zheng, Lanfang Huang, Haijiang Tong, Qiang Shu, Yaoqin Hu, Menghua Ge, Keqin Deng, Liuya Zhang, Bin Zou, Baoli Cheng, Jianguo Xu

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) modulate the immune response and reduce lung injury in animal models. Currently, no clinical studies of the effects of MSCs in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exist. The objectives of this study were first to examine the possible adverse events after systemic administration of allogeneic adipose-derived MSCs in ARDS patients and second to determine potential efficacy of MSCs on ARDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 287 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Student > Master 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Other 23 8%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 80 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 89 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,524,040
of 25,464,544 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#122
of 3,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,028
of 239,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,464,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.