↓ Skip to main content

Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: a discrete choice experiment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: a discrete choice experiment
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-10-197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sitaporn Youngkong, Rob Baltussen, Sripen Tantivess, Xander Koolman, Yot Teerawattananon

Abstract

Although a sizeable budget is available for HIV/AIDS control in Thailand, there will never be enough resources to implement every programme for all target groups at full scale. As such, there is a need to prioritize HIV/AIDS programmes. However, as of yet, there is no evidence on the criteria that should guide the priority setting of HIV/AIDS programmes in Thailand, including their relative importance. Also, it is not clear whether different stakeholders share similar preferences.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 90 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 27%
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 32%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 15%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2010.
All research outputs
#20,143,522
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#7,045
of 7,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,704
of 94,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#44
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.