↓ Skip to main content

Chronic oral or intraarticular administration of docosahexaenoic acid reduces nociception and knee edema and improves functional outcomes in a mouse model of Complete Freund’s Adjuvant–induced knee…

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic oral or intraarticular administration of docosahexaenoic acid reduces nociception and knee edema and improves functional outcomes in a mouse model of Complete Freund’s Adjuvant–induced knee arthritis
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/ar4502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana M Torres-Guzman, Carlos E Morado-Urbina, Perla A Alvarado-Vazquez, Rosa I Acosta-Gonzalez, Aracely E Chávez-Piña, Rosa M Montiel-Ruiz, Juan M Jimenez-Andrade

Abstract

Clinical and pre-clinical studies have shown that supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) reduce joint destruction and inflammation present in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, effects of individual n-3 PUFAs on chronic arthritic pain have not been evaluated. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine whether purified docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, a n-3 PUFA), reduces spontaneous pain-related behavior, knee edema and improves functional outcomes in a mouse model of knee arthritis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 12 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,268,579
of 21,362,911 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2,401
of 2,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,104
of 207,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,362,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.