↓ Skip to main content

Clouded leopard phylogeny revisited: support for species recognition and population division between Borneo and Sumatra

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clouded leopard phylogeny revisited: support for species recognition and population division between Borneo and Sumatra
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, May 2007
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-4-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Wilting, Valerie A Buckley-Beason, Heike Feldhaar, Jürgen Gadau, Stephen J O'Brien, K Eduard Linsenmair

Abstract

The clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa) is one of the least known cat species and depletion of their forested habitats puts it under heavy pressure. Recently reclassification of Bornean clouded leopards (N. nebulosa diardi) to species level (N.diardi) was suggested based on molecular and morphological evidence. Since the genetic results were based solely on three Bornean samples we re-evaluated this partition using additional samples of Bornean clouded leopards (N = 7) and we were also able to include specimens from Sumatra (N = 3), which were lacking in previous analysis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
India 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 231 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 19%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Other 16 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 63%
Environmental Science 35 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 32 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,553,603
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#212
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,285
of 82,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.