↓ Skip to main content

Exome capture from saliva produces high quality genomic and metagenomic data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exome capture from saliva produces high quality genomic and metagenomic data
Published in
BMC Genomics, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-262
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey M Kidd, Thomas J Sharpton, Dean Bobo, Paul J Norman, Alicia R Martin, Meredith L Carpenter, Martin Sikora, Christopher R Gignoux, Neda Nemat-Gorgani, Alexandra Adams, Moraima Guadalupe, Xiaosen Guo, Qiang Feng, Yingrui Li, Xiao Liu, Peter Parham, Eileen G Hoal, Marcus W Feldman, Katherine S Pollard, Jeffrey D Wall, Carlos D Bustamante, Brenna M Henn

Abstract

Targeted capture of genomic regions reduces sequencing cost while generating higher coverage by allowing biomedical researchers to focus on specific loci of interest, such as exons. Targeted capture also has the potential to facilitate the generation of genomic data from DNA collected via saliva or buccal cells. DNA samples derived from these cell types tend to have a lower human DNA yield, may be degraded from age and/or have contamination from bacteria or other ambient oral microbiota. However, thousands of samples have been previously collected from these cell types, and saliva collection has the advantage that it is a non-invasive and appropriate for a wide variety of research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
South Africa 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 117 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 18 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,771,193
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#379
of 11,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,612
of 231,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#3
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.