You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The prevalence of waterpipe tobacco smoking among the general and specific populations: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-244 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elie A Akl, Sameer K Gunukula, Sohaib Aleem, Rawad Obeid, Philippe Abou Jaoude, Roland Honeine, Jihad Irani |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study was to systematically review the medical literature for the prevalence of waterpipe tobacco use among the general and specific populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Lebanon | 1 | <1% |
| Jordan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 21% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 25% |
| Unknown | 45 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 59 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,416,872
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,550
of 14,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,877
of 109,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#12
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.