↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in first-line treatment of squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study protocol: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in first-line treatment of squamous non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Systematic Reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-3-102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy M DeLozier, Jacqueline Brown, Fanni Natanegara, Luping Zhao, Zhanglin Lin Cui, Stephen L Able, Lee Bowman, Joseph Treat, Lisa M Hess

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 12 31%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Mathematics 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 7 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,609,698
of 17,365,229 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,006
of 1,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,305
of 277,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,365,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.