↓ Skip to main content

Dogs, cats, parasites, and humans in Brazil: opening the black box

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
401 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dogs, cats, parasites, and humans in Brazil: opening the black box
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filipe Dantas-Torres, Domenico Otranto

Abstract

Dogs and cats in Brazil serve as primary hosts for a considerable number of parasites, which may affect their health and wellbeing. These may include endoparasites (e.g., protozoa, cestodes, trematodes, and nematodes) and ectoparasites (i.e., fleas, lice, mites, and ticks). While some dog and cat parasites are highly host-specific (e.g., Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Felicola subrostratus for cats, and Angiostrongylus vasorum and Trichodectes canis for dogs), others may easily switch to other hosts, including humans. In fact, several dog and cat parasites (e.g., Toxoplasma gondii, Dipylidium caninum, Ancylostoma caninum, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Toxocara canis) are important not only from a veterinary perspective but also from a medical standpoint. In addition, some of them (e.g., Lynxacarus radovskyi on cats and Rangelia vitalii in dogs) are little known to most veterinary practitioners working in Brazil. This article is a compendium on dog and cat parasites in Brazil and a call for a One Health approach towards a better management of some of these parasites, which may potentially affect humans. Practical aspects related to the diagnosis, treatment, and control of parasitic diseases of dogs and cats in Brazil are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Unknown 393 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 16%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Researcher 41 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 9%
Professor 22 5%
Other 79 20%
Unknown 110 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 97 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 127 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,854
of 5,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,184
of 321,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#23
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.