You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Walking reduces sensorimotor network connectivity compared to standing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Troy M Lau, Joseph T Gwin, Daniel P Ferris |
| Abstract |
Considerable effort has been devoted to mapping the functional and effective connectivity of the human brain, but these efforts have largely been limited to tasks involving stationary subjects. Recent advances with high-density electroencephalography (EEG) and Independent Components Analysis (ICA) have enabled study of electrocortical activity during human locomotion. The goal of this work was to measure the effective connectivity of cortical activity during human standing and walking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 20% |
| Researcher | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Professor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 40 | 20% |
| Engineering | 31 | 16% |
| Psychology | 19 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#885
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,291
of 329,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.