You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A qualitative comparative analysis of well-managed school sanitation in Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christie Chatterley, Amy Javernick-Will, Karl G Linden, Kawser Alam, Laure Bottinelli, Mohini Venkatesh |
| Abstract |
Continued management of sanitation and hygiene services, post-intervention, is a global challenge, particularly in the school-setting. This situation threatens anticipated impacts of school sanitation and hygiene investments. To improve programming and policies, and increase the effectiveness of limited development resources, we seek to understand how and why some schools have well-managed sanitation post-intervention, while others do not. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 30 | 17% |
| Engineering | 24 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,241,370
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,340
of 14,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,988
of 304,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#24
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.