↓ Skip to main content

Severe refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia with both warm and cold autoantibodies that responded completely to a single cycle of rituximab: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Severe refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia with both warm and cold autoantibodies that responded completely to a single cycle of rituximab: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1752-1947-5-156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shilpi Gupta, Anita Szerszen, Fadi Nakhl, Seema Varma, Aaron Gottesman, Frank Forte, Meekoo Dhar

Abstract

Mixed warm and cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia runs a chronic course with severe intermittent exacerbations. Therapeutic options for the treatment of hemolysis associated with autoimmune hemolytic anemia are limited. There have been only two reported cases of the effective use of rituximab in the treatment of patients with mixed autoimmune hemolytic anemia. We report a case of severe mixed autoimmune hemolytic anemia that did not respond to steroids and responded to four weekly doses of rituximab (one cycle).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,030,727
of 22,139,693 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#462
of 3,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,427
of 207,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,139,693 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,759 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them