You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence for the biogenesis of more than 1,000 novel human microRNAs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2014-15-4-r57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc R Friedländer, Esther Lizano, Anna JS Houben, Daniela Bezdan, Mónica Báñez-Coronel, Grzegorz Kudla, Elisabet Mateu-Huertas, Birgit Kagerbauer, Justo González, Kevin C Chen, Emily M LeProust, Eulàlia Martí, Xavier Estivill |
| Abstract |
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are established regulators of development, cell identity and disease. Although nearly two thousand human miRNA genes are known and new ones are continuously discovered, no attempt has been made to gauge the total miRNA content of the human genome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 33% |
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| France | 2 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Qatar | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 284 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 19% |
| Researcher | 51 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 18% |
| Unknown | 58 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 66 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 71 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,647,794
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,092
of 4,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,940
of 241,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#32
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.