You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Socio-epidemiological determinants of 2002 plague outbreak in Himachal Pradesh, India: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-325 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonu Goel, Harvinder Kaur, Anil Kumar Gupta, Umesh Chauhan, Amarjeet Singh |
| Abstract |
This qualitative investigation was conducted to determine the socio-epidemiological factors related to the plague outbreak (2002) in Himachal Pradesh (HP), India. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,174,910
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,255
of 14,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,241
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#146
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.