You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fundamental movement skills and physical activity among children living in low-income communities: a cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-11-49 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kristen E Cohen, Philip J Morgan, Ronald C Plotnikoff, Robin Callister, David R Lubans |
Abstract |
Although previous studies have demonstrated that children with high levels of fundamental movement skill competency are more active throughout the day, little is known regarding children's fundamental movement skill competency and their physical activity during key time periods of the school day (i.e., lunchtime, recess and after-school). The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between fundamental movement skill competency and objectively measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) throughout the school day among children attending primary schools in low-income communities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
United States | 2 | 18% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
Ireland | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 343 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 56 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 10% |
Lecturer | 28 | 8% |
Researcher | 22 | 6% |
Other | 64 | 18% |
Unknown | 101 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 126 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 5% |
Psychology | 12 | 3% |
Other | 28 | 8% |
Unknown | 117 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,592,999
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,273
of 1,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,356
of 229,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.