You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do heart and respiratory rate variability improve prediction of extubation outcomes in critically ill patients?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13822 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew JE Seely, Andrea Bravi, Christophe Herry, Geoffrey Green, André Longtin, Tim Ramsay, Dean Fergusson, Lauralyn McIntyre, Dalibor Kubelik, Donna E Maziak, Niall Ferguson, Samuel M Brown, Sangeeta Mehta, Claudio Martin, Gordon Rubenfeld, Frank J Jacono, Gari Clifford, Anna Fazekas, John Marshall |
| Abstract |
Prolonged ventilation and failed extubation are associated with increased harm and cost. The added value of heart and respiratory rate variability (HRV and RRV) during spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) to predict extubation failure remains unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Greece | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 24% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 32% |
| Engineering | 17 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,714,335
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,133
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,509
of 241,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#71
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.