↓ Skip to main content

A green-light inducible lytic system for cyanobacterial cells

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A green-light inducible lytic system for cyanobacterial cells
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-7-56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kotone Miyake, Koichi Abe, Stefano Ferri, Mitsuharu Nakajima, Mayumi Nakamura, Wataru Yoshida, Katsuhiro Kojima, Kazunori Ikebukuro, Koji Sode

Abstract

Cyanobacteria are an attractive candidate for the production of biofuel because of their ability to capture carbon dioxide by photosynthesis and grow on non-arable land. However, because huge quantities of water are required for cultivation, strict water management is one of the greatest issues in algae- and cyanobacteria-based biofuel production. In this study, we aim to construct a lytic cyanobacterium that can be regulated by a physical signal (green-light illumination) for future use in the recovery of biofuel related compounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 140 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 24%
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 27%
Chemical Engineering 4 3%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 26 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2014.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#761
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,290
of 241,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.