↓ Skip to main content

Relative efficiency and productivity: a preliminary exploration of public hospitals in Beijing, China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relative efficiency and productivity: a preliminary exploration of public hospitals in Beijing, China
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao Li, Siping Dong, Tingfang Liu

Abstract

Third-grade hospitals in Beijing have been rapidly developing in capacity and scale for many years. These hospitals receive a large number of patients, and ensuring their efficient operation is crucial in meeting people's healthcare needs. In this context, a study of their relative efficiency and productivity would be helpful to identify the driving factors and further improve their performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 104 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 28 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 12%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,454
of 7,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,554
of 226,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#126
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.