↓ Skip to main content

Intensive care unit depth of sleep: proof of concept of a simple electroencephalography index in the non-sedated

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intensive care unit depth of sleep: proof of concept of a simple electroencephalography index in the non-sedated
Published in
Critical Care, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13823
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurens Reinke, Johannes H van der Hoeven, Michel JAM van Putten, Willem Dieperink, Jaap E Tulleken

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are known to experience severely disturbed sleep, with possible detrimental effects on short- and long- term outcomes. Investigation into the exact causes and effects of disturbed sleep has been hampered by cumbersome and time consuming methods of measuring and staging sleep. We introduce a novel method for ICU depth of sleep analysis, the ICU depth of sleep index (IDOS index), using single channel electroencephalography (EEG) and apply it to outpatient recordings. A proof of concept is shown in non-sedated ICU patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 45%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2014.
All research outputs
#11,962,798
of 21,360,407 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,073
of 5,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,841
of 207,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#35
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,360,407 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.